Letti42
i mean... by this logic in that you can rely on the already existing parts of the program you might as well just make a function called e and submit e() for a total character count of 3
or better yet make a variable named e and just put e in the console for a total of 1

but ngl i think the idea is that you could be able to execute this in any console

I mean since this is high level JS there's not much i can do to minimize stuff here unfortunately gamelab environment takes the L here since i can't use the pollyfills CDO is missing either but oh well

// 79
throw a="\n0011110\n0010010\n"+"1110111\n1010101\n1010111\n1110010\n0011110\n0010010"+a;
// 79 +1 up ack (cleaner no weird parsing)
throw(0x9e92f7d5d7f2.toString(2)+40594..toString(2)).replace(/.(.{7})/g,"\n$1")

unlike acks method you just need to add another start bit in the front so it'll be forced to fomat it correctly since no prototype of pad exists (cuz idfkw) this is the least amount of effort to force it to be rendered though if you do plan on having more challenges like this you should offer different rewards for different categories (even if it's just between enviroments) because some have a lot more features that lead to running the code in only 1 enviroment
though i support Letti winning Ain't no way somebody is getting lower than 1 function call

in case your wondering why throw? it gives a console message and is several times shorter than console.log

Also fun fact CDO can handle basically any other format other than binary it hates it any the only way to deal with it properly is through strings and or parsing methods

Binary_Coder it zero's out because the max number it can handle it 2⁵³ which is longer than an int but shorter than a long very weird right (it also doesn't support big ints so don't even try)! so i split the number as you can see it takes the first 6 as hex since it's shorter but it's actually longer to write 40,594 in hex so i opted for that instead.... also didn't know that was a stack topic that's the shortest way possible to match what i wanted to match

Ravage and if we get to use anything to generate output rather than actual code char count I'll try a different approach

Ravage in any console...? including applab or gamelab or both or can i bump up and use polyfills that actually exist in es5? read and got confused.... then the additional statement made it more confusing

Ravage so... if i were say to perhaps fill in those missing pollyfills it wouldn't count hypothetically speaking oh well that sucks