[WUT] Adam ASmartCoder Code.org defines a chat as any multi-user app hosted on the site that allows communication "outside of a legitimate classroom context."
person why an email system when you have a forum anyway i dont understand why people put in so much effort
Blockyheadman ASmartCoder any way of communicating with others on cdo via any of their tools would go against that rule from my knowledge. if you looked into it, you might be able to try and find a loophole in their wording but that would be difficult
ASmartCoder What is a legitimate classroom context? Assuming I asked my teacher if we could make a chat as an assignment, and she said yes. Then, we started using the chat IN THAT CLASS TIME ONLY. That would count as a legit classroom context, correct?
Fluffypoopo EZ solution make a ton of alts have them all in a class thing and boom you can say it is for a class project
INTERNECION I misclicked no but it is definitely a chat sadly. Ah man why did the chats have to be neg'd by CDO like that man. I was having fun bro
[WUT] Adam Fluffypoopo It makes sense, though. Code.org is supposed to be a safe educational coding website and most chats don't even use the moderation features.
Mellow [WUT] Adam and even if they did, it could very easily be circumvented with either by viewing the code, or if it had protection, using the key value editor thing or incognito So it was very much a good decision of CDO
Fluffypoopo Honestly I do not care that they removed chats I am just very mad that they deleted Locus even after I removed the chat
Fluffypoopo and they will not even respond to my report trying to get Locus back before it is permanently deleted and they wasted soooo much time that it was permanently deleted
