ackvonhuelio I know the basics. 😒 I took a couple coding classes, I've read a few books on code. Just because Nver might be getting a bit carried away with what he's saying about knowing a ton of code and being able to hack this forum doesn't mean he's not good at what he does. I'll have his sister talk to him about the whole 'I can hack this forum' thing. About the tasty code... I've never figured that one out and neither has his sister.

      birthdayboy224 Agreed. Some people might look at this:

      And they'd be like: "WOW THAT'S FANTASTIC." While others would look at it and be like "It's not very well done, slightly sloppy and kinda lame compared to a trained artist."

          SquirrelGuy-5 Classes don't work in code.org but a lot of their functionality can be reconstructed by making a function which returns an object:

          class Rect {
    constructor(w,h) {
        this.w = w;
        this.h = h;
    }
    area() {
        return this.w * this.h;
    }
}

          is basically the same as

          function Rect(w,h) {
    var obj = {};
    obj.w = w;
    obj.h = h;
    obj.area = function() { 
        return this.w * this.h;
    }
}

              Lil-Starcast without using money

              Look there are plenty of free hosting sites, I challenged him to make a simple webapp to prove himself using github and render. I'll wait until he responds to that before criticizing him more. Also, anybody can make an AI image generator using an API.

                  DragonFireGames
                  could it just be
                  function rect(w,h){
                  this.w = w;
                  this.h = h;
                  }
                  rect.prototype.area = function(){
                  return this.w * this.height;
                  }
                  and
                  var something = new rect(50,50); ?

                  what i'm saying is i don't really understand why you needed var obj = {};

                      Chat